Why not compile
Java for Windows?
Since most Java applets run on PC platform, why not offer a compiled version of Java directly run in Windows without JVM? Users can still use standard Java via JVM, it's just a performance enhancement. That would negate the entire purpose of the java development
program. Notice how you asked the question, "...since most...!" That should
indicate to you that not all OS's are windows platforms and the purpose
of java is to provide a language that can be interpreted(or used) by all
OS's. Just because a person can program doesn't mean they will be using
a computer that
We can still use standard Java through JVM. Because some Java programs are just like windows applications without involving multiple platforms, a compiled version for windows doesn't hurt, it only provides users with one more choice. I'd like to know how much performance gain a compile version can offer, if someone could do a benchmark test. Actually, the reason why you don't see compilers for Java
is that the language is not yet stable. By the time somebody creates
a Java Windows compiler, a new version pops out of the hopper at Sun. It
takes a lot of time and testing to get one done correctly, so it is just
not yet economically profitable. You can find some compilers around, but
if you look closely, you'll see they are mostly based upon one of the older
JRE's. In one benchmark comparison at JavaOne, a presenter showed
that compiled C++ code ran 6 times faster over Java 1.2 for the simple
stuff. As more complex operations were invoked, C++ was running at
many multiples faster. The JIT compilers have reduced some of the apparent
slowness of Java when
Do you have a Java Problem?
Java Books
Return to : Java Programming Hints and Tips All the site contents are Copyright © www.erpgreat.com
and the content authors. All rights reserved.
|